CANDACE FLEMING

Designing The Family Romanov

gr_familyromanov_print copyMany peo­ple have asked me about the design of The Fam­i­ly Romanov. Why not scat­ter those archival pho­tographs through­out the text as is usu­al­ly done in non­fic­tion books for young readers?

Because this book demand­ed some­thing dif­fer­ent… some­thing dar­ing.

Let me explain fur­ther by reveal­ing the three rea­sons behind my design choice.

  1. I want­ed the sto­ry­telling to do the heavy lift­ing this time around. My goal was to appeal to kids as read­ers, not report writ­ers. I want­ed The Fam­i­ly Romanov to have a nov­el­is­tic feel both in the way it looks—small trim size, no side­bars, pho­tographs in insets—and the way it reads. I earnest­ly believe there are read­ers out there who crave a nar­ra­tive non­fic­tion expe­ri­ence; one that allows them to use their imag­i­na­tion just as they would when read­ing a nov­el. We shouldn’t under­es­ti­mate read­ers by assum­ing they need a pic­ture on every page to enjoy and/or under­stand a true sto­ry. After all, none of their big fan­ta­sy nov­els have pic­tures. Why must their non­fic­tion? As a wise librar­i­an once told me, “When the text is the star, you remem­ber moments in the sto­ry. They linger. They’re vivid. You don’t recall the pho­tographs.” I made the choice to make the sto­ry The Fam­i­ly Romanov’s star. There are no cap­tions or side­bars to frag­ment the reader’s atten­tion. And the book is in no way a visu­al expe­ri­ence like my pre­vi­ous non­fic­tion books. Instead, I want­ed the Romanovs’ lives to stand out vivid­ly in my read­er’s imag­i­na­tion. I want­ed them to linger.
  2. In the last few years, I’ve spent a lot of time talk­ing with mid­dle grade and high school read­ers about non­fic­tion. Many have told me that just the look of those high­ly visu­al books with their big trim size, cap­tioned pho­tographs, and side­bars dis­cour­aged them. “They look like text­books,” one-eighth grad­er told me. “They look bor­ing.” So I thought, why shouldn’t these old­er read­ers have more non­fic­tion books that look and read like a novel?
  3. And final­ly, since I knew read­ers for this book would be old­er, I came to the con­clu­sion that I didn’t need to include dozens of pho­tographs and oth­er visu­al ele­ments. My read­ers are savvy. They know how to find infor­ma­tion. And in the dig­i­tal age, myr­i­ad pho­tos and film clips of the Romanovs exist online…and they’re just a few clicks away. To help get kids get start­ed, I made sure to include a few great sites in the book’s back matter.

2 Responses

  1. It’s a gor­geous book. I’ve read quite a few adult books about Nicholas and Alexan­dra and their unfor­tu­nate fam­i­ly and end­ing. This one gave me new mate­r­i­al, and an inti­mate look at the dynam­ics of that fam­i­ly and how they helped lead the unwit­ting chil­dren to their trag­ic end­ing — all deliv­ered tight­ly and com­pelling­ly. I loved it. Great job.

  2. I am not a young read­er by any means, but feel your book is mes­mer­iz­ing and infor­ma­tive as well. The con­trast between the peas­ant and the auto­crat is espe­cial­ly com­pelling and ‘eye-open­ing’. I have recent­ly been read­ing MANY books about Nicholas and Alexan­dra (Helen Rap­pa­port’s biog­ra­phy and the nov­el, The Kitchen Boy, to name two). Of these three, your book seems to describe Alexan­dra in the worst light — a reli­gious nut and pos­si­bly a hypochon­dri­ac. The oth­ers described her in a much rosier light. Because the fam­i­ly was even­tu­al­ly mur­dered, I pre­fer to think of her as a saint­ly moth­er, not an over-pro­tec­tive or mean one (cold baths in the morn­ing, not with­stand­ing). Believe me, I am not crit­i­ciz­ing you. I fear your descrip­tion is the more accu­rate and that makes me sad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.